As the Trump administration reached its first 100 days, the U.S. financial markets experienced a period of volatility and optimism. Morgan Stanley’s analysis of this critical timeframe offered a deep dive into the winners and losers of the market, drawing attention to sectors and companies that saw substantial gains or losses due to the new policies and executive actions. While the stock market as a whole displayed strong performance during these initial months, individual companies, sectors, and financial strategies faced varying degrees of success. This article explores those findings in detail, analyzes broader market trends, and offers insights into the long-term impact of the Trump administration’s first 100 days on the financial landscape.
Upon taking office in January 2017, President Donald Trump quickly set a tone of disruption, prioritizing deregulation, tax reform, and a pro-business agenda. His promises of job creation, lowering corporate tax rates, and fostering a climate of reduced government intervention led to initial optimism in the markets. The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq Composite all posted strong gains as investors anticipated positive outcomes from the Trump administration’s economic policies.
One of the most significant factors influencing market movements during the first 100 days was the announcement of a major tax overhaul plan. Investors responded positively to the proposed cuts in corporate tax rates, which were expected to boost profitability and stimulate economic growth. However, the Trump administration also faced challenges, including the failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, which tempered some of the enthusiasm in the early days.
Several sectors and companies saw notable benefits during Trump’s first 100 days, driven by the expectations of policy shifts, tax cuts, and deregulation. The following sectors stood out as major winners:
Financial stocks were among the biggest beneficiaries of the Trump administration’s first 100 days. With promises of deregulation and a more favorable business climate, banks and financial institutions were expected to experience higher profitability. The Trump administration signaled an intent to roll back certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, which had been implemented in response to the 2008 financial crisis. Repealing parts of this legislation was seen as a way to reduce compliance costs for banks, leading to increased investor confidence.
Another sector that thrived during the early months of the Trump administration was industrials. Trump’s promises to invest in infrastructure and stimulate job creation were welcomed by companies in construction, transportation, and materials production.
The energy sector, particularly fossil fuel companies, was also a significant beneficiary. The Trump administration’s pro-oil and gas stance, including actions to open up federal lands to drilling and reverse climate change regulations, led to optimism among energy producers.
Technology stocks, while somewhat overshadowed by other sectors, also saw positive movement in the early days of the Trump administration. Companies like Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google) continued to grow as the administration’s stance on business taxes and regulation was viewed favorably by the tech sector.
Despite concerns about potential regulatory scrutiny, the general belief in a less restrictive business environment allowed technology giants to retain investor confidence, with many benefitting from a broader growth in global tech demand.
While certain sectors benefited, others faced significant challenges due to the Trump administration’s policies and executive actions. Below are some of the most notable losers from the first 100 days:
The healthcare sector was one of the most affected by the Trump administration’s first months in office. The failure to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created uncertainty in the market, particularly for companies reliant on government subsidies or the regulatory framework set up under the ACA. In addition, the proposed cuts to Medicaid and Medicare funding raised concerns about the future of healthcare services.
Consumer staples, which are typically viewed as a defensive sector, also faced a tough period early in the Trump administration. The uncertainty surrounding trade policies, particularly with Mexico and China, created volatility in this sector. Companies like Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble saw mixed performances, as rising input costs and concerns about potential tariffs dampened investor enthusiasm.
Traditional retail companies, already struggling with the rise of e-commerce, were hit by several challenges during Trump’s first 100 days. In addition to the overall uncertainty about economic policy, retail companies faced increased competition from online platforms, as well as concerns about wage policies and trade tariffs that could affect costs.
The first 100 days of the Trump administration highlighted the immediate market reactions to proposed policy changes. While the market surged early on, reflecting optimism about deregulation and tax cuts, several factors pointed to a more nuanced long-term view. The failure to deliver on major legislative priorities, such as healthcare reform, tempered some of the initial market exuberance.
Moreover, as Trump’s policies continued to evolve, investors began to recalibrate their expectations. The potential for trade wars, particularly with China and Mexico, raised concerns about the global economy. Similarly, the administration’s stance on climate change and environmental regulations presented challenges for companies in sectors like renewable energy and clean tech.
As the Trump administration moved past its first 100 days, the financial markets entered a phase of recalibration. The initial optimism, particularly regarding tax reform and deregulation, provided an early boost, but the challenges that emerged—both domestic and international—suggested that the road ahead would be far from smooth. Investors who understood the implications of Trump’s policies, along with those of future administrations, would likely need to adopt a long-term perspective to successfully navigate the post-Trump financial landscape.
While the winners and losers during the first 100 days painted a clear picture of short-term market reactions, the broader economic shifts will unfold over the coming years. Companies that can adapt to changing regulations, international trade dynamics, and evolving consumer preferences will be the ones to emerge stronger in the post-Trump era. Morgan Stanley’s analysis offers a deeper dive into these predictions and strategies, providing investors with the tools they need to make informed decisions.
For further insights into market trends and investment strategies, you can also explore CNBC’s coverage of financial markets.
See more CNBC Network
Discover which health care stocks could be at risk of collapse this quarter, including Paragon…
Discover how Mongolian Mining's OTCQX debut creates new investment opportunities in the Mongolian mining sector.
Inflation data is on the horizon as Wall Street anticipates a record election year for…
SMCI stock faces unexpected drops in pre-market trading. Explore the reasons behind this turbulence despite…
Discover the latest insights on Macy's and Adobe as key stocks to watch in the…
Discover expert insights on Dogecoin's potential peaks and the risks involved in cryptocurrency trading.