Discrimination Claims: DACA Beneficiaries Take Action Against Credit Union
A group of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients has filed a formal complaint against a Texas-based credit union, alleging systemic discrimination in lending practices. The plaintiffs claim the institution denied them auto loans and credit products despite strong financial profiles, raising concerns about equitable access for immigrant communities. Legal experts suggest the case could set a precedent for financial inclusion nationwide.
Allegations of Systemic Bias in Lending Practices
The complaint, filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Texas Department of Banking, details multiple instances where DACA recipients with credit scores above 700 and stable incomes reportedly faced unexplained denials. One plaintiff, 28-year-old San Antonio resident Gabriela Mendez, provided documentation showing she was rejected for a $15,000 auto loan despite having a 725 credit score and six years of continuous employment.
“The loan officer told me their hands were tied because of my immigration status,” Mendez stated. “But DACA recipients have work authorization and Social Security numbers—we pay taxes and contribute like anyone else.”
Financial inclusion advocates point to troubling patterns:
- 72% of DACA applicants report difficulties securing loans per 2022 National Immigration Law Center data
- Average credit scores for DACA recipients (689) exceed the national average (680)
- Only 38% of DACA holders own homes compared to 65% of native-born citizens
Credit Union’s Defense and Industry Standards
The credit union in question, which serves over 50,000 members across three states, maintains its practices comply with all regulations. In a prepared statement, Chief Compliance Officer David Ellison emphasized: “We evaluate all applicants equally based on creditworthiness and ability to repay. Immigration status alone never determines approval—that would violate fair lending laws.”
However, banking experts note significant industry confusion regarding DACA recipients’ status. While they possess valid Social Security numbers, some financial institutions categorize them as higher risk due to the program’s temporary nature. The Congressional Research Service confirms DACA recipients have lower default rates (2.1%) than the general population (3.5%) on installment loans.
Legal Precedents and Regulatory Landscape
This case follows a 2020 settlement where a major bank paid $1.26 million after denying mortgages to DACA recipients. The Department of Justice had ruled such denials violated the Fair Housing Act. Consumer protection attorney Lisa Wong explains: “The Equal Credit Opportunity Act clearly prohibits discrimination based on national origin. Courts are increasingly viewing DACA-related denials through this lens.”
Key legal considerations include:
- The 1974 Equal Credit Opportunity Act’s protections
- CFPB’s 2019 guidance affirming DACA recipients as protected applicants
- Pending state legislation in 12 states clarifying lending rules for non-citizens
Broader Implications for Financial Inclusion
The case highlights growing tensions between immigrant communities and financial institutions. Over 600,000 DACA recipients contribute an estimated $9.5 billion annually in federal taxes, yet many face barriers building wealth through conventional means. Urban Institute research shows:
“DACA holders are 28% less likely to receive loan approvals than comparable U.S. citizens, even when controlling for income and credit history.” – Dr. Elena Ruiz, Senior Policy Analyst
Community development advocates argue this creates a ripple effect. “When you exclude qualified borrowers from mainstream credit, you push them toward predatory lenders,” notes José García of UnidosUS. “That undermines the financial health of entire neighborhoods.”
Next Steps and Community Response
The CFPB has 60 days to determine whether to investigate the claims. Meanwhile, immigrant rights organizations are launching financial literacy workshops and lobbying for clearer industry guidelines. Several plaintiffs have joined advocacy groups to share their stories, hoping to spur policy changes.
Financial institutions face increasing pressure to audit their practices. As public scrutiny grows, experts recommend:
- Conducting fair lending training specific to non-citizen applicants
- Reviewing underwriting algorithms for potential biases
- Establishing clear documentation requirements for DACA applicants
This developing story underscores the complex intersection of immigration policy and financial access. Readers impacted by similar issues can contact the National Consumer Law Center’s immigrant justice project for confidential guidance. The outcome could reshape lending practices for millions of aspiring Americans.
See more CNBC Network
